Recently I wrote a bit about my political doings this
election year. I laud those of you who
are actively aligned with the political party and candidates of your choice
providing assistance by working in campaigns in the many ways of support.
Many years past when I was single I was President of one of
the “Young” political parties small town chapters, very actively soliciting
more new young members. When the
election time was near we were going door-to-door, distributing literature,
engaging in dialogue on the issues, offering to make-certain voters had
transportation to wherever they voted, whatever their political party
preference. Feelings ran high during
that election, too.
Had I known then, what I came to learn only many years later
I never would have supported the candidate I did. In the small town where I was living, all the
negative information that would have caused me to probably reject that
candidate was packaged and received by us, his supporters, in such a way as to
indicate it was all untrue factual distortion concocted by his opposition. But, so many years later when residing in
that candidates home state where much of his chicanery had occurred, I learned
the truth.
We do the best we can with the knowledge we acquire and make
our choices. In retrospect, if I had to
pick one major lesson I learned from that early naive youthful political
experience, it is that I wish I had listened more to the opposition, made more
of an effort to check the facts about what was being said though we had limited
means to do so.
I grew up in a family and a State steeped in one particular
political party tradition. Oh, there was
debate alright, but mostly within that parties parameters. Whatever the issue between parties the debate
entered into always came from an almost automatic point of view that the
opposing view probably didn’t have any credibility. Keep in mind that we all thought we were
being objective and openly examining all sides of each issue, but the reality
was quite different as I had learned years later when I became active in
college debate. There, we argued one
side of an issue one time and the next time had to take the opposite point of
view, all with the goal of winning both times.
There’s nothing quite like learning the weaknesses of any point of view
when one has to learn all the fine points and then argue against them.
Even having come to the knowledge I had about issues before
I became politically active, I realize now how few fact checking sources we had
access to compared to today with reliable fact checking organizations readily,
literally, at our fingertips via the Internet.
The flip side of that is there is an over-abundance of
so-called “news” sources regurgitating “facts” that need to be checked. Too many times we are subjected to
authoritative-sounding voices speaking in absolutes that mask the warped distortions
in what they say. “News” sources – too many of which make little
or no pretense at differentiating between actual honest-to-gawd news facts, rumor,
gossip, opinion, innuendo, deliberate distortion of information. Trying to stay on top of checking out this
flood of information, misinformation, for facts or downright lies and anything
in between, has become a nightmare in itself.
I guess it’s better than what existed in years past, but sometimes I do
wonder. It is enough to cause some
people to throw up their hands in surrender and decide not to vote at all. Personally, I think that’s a cop-out, but to
each his own.
I’ve been giving it my level best for many years to consider
all sides of every issue. I’ve already
admitted to having made some mistakes, but I have learned. I long
ago evolved a manner of viewing and living life that pre-disposes me to a point
of view which would certainly be brought to bear on the issues I consider. You know – little things like “rights,” “equality,”
“values,” “ethics,” “morality,” “choice,” “freedom,” to name a few significant
words in that milieu.
So, it should come as no surprise that in this, one of the
most important presidential campaigns in my life time, that part of my process
(everybody has their own, no doubt) was to visit my communities campaign
headquarters for the two major political parties. Just so you won’t be disappointed if you keep
reading further, nothing profound occurred when I ventured into their dens, though I
disappointed myself by not always retaining the calm cool collected dispassionate
manner I had intended.
Anyone who has read some of what I’ve written previously
here and elsewhere knows I’ve pretty well determined where my vote will go, and
I have even confidently, on occasion, pronounced how I’ll vote and will likely
continue to do so. Still, until my
ballot is in the box, nothing is a sure thing, so I keep trying to maintain an
open mind.
My first visit was to the Republican Headquarters which opened
earlier than that of the other party, several weeks before the Florida
Convention. The Headquarters is in a
very prominent visible popular strip shopping center north of and facing famous Route 66 known as Foothill Blvd. in
our city. The strip has a few store vacancies,
but is anchored by a busy grocery chain whose health food products include meats,
produce and organic items. A prominent
national bank is in the process of constructing a new branch there expected to
open soon.
Further down the strip, on the drive’s opposite side is a
long vacated stand alone building that once housed a bank which collapsed with the Wall St. financial
debacle. On the strip are a Chinese
restaurant and the administrative offices for our very unpopular water company
that has continued to charge our residents obscenely higher rates than other
cities pay that they also serve (a topic
for another time since in years to come cities elsewhere may find themselves
subject to similar exploitation by greedy water companies.)
Be aware that Democrats usually garner the majority of election
votes in our city, but we’ve had our share of effective and respected
Republican government officials. In
fact, during our state’s recent redistricting we were very pleased with the
Republican chosen to represent our city and the final official plan he was instrumental in seeing was adopted. By the
same token I’ve been one of many extremely displeased with our Republican U.S. Representative elected by others in our then
district who was part of those obstinately refusing to govern. He’s not running for office this year since
redistricting, but will likely be active behind the scenes.
I was the only Republican Headquarters visitor in the middle
of a mid-week afternoon not long after their national Florida convention had ended. I gravitated to some tables on which printed
leaflets of various sizes, shapes, colors and number of pages were laid
out. A middle-aged gentleman approached
and asked if there was anything he could assist with. I asked if they had a copy of the Republican
Platform and he was a bit unprepared for that request, saying, finally,
“No.”
Meanwhile, a woman from further in the room injected that
there would be a copy of it on the Internet (which, I already knew, but I had wanted a printed copy)
and I said, “Oh, that’s okay then, I can
go out and get a copy there,” as I picked up a small printed list of issue
points they had for distribution. I
mentioned I had a real problem with a lie Ryan had told which I cited, that
caused the woman to become all excited as she came toward me voicing in a
condemning and a very accusatory tone, “You’re a Democrat!”
I said, “No, I’m not” as I briefly recapped my voter
registration and some previous political history. She went on to say, in a sudden burst that
seemed to be in confrontation-type attack mode “Well, Bill Clinton lied!” to
which I responded that had nothing to do with the Ryan issue to which I was
referring. By now, my voice is
irritated, I realized, as the gentleman standing off to the side, but centered somewhere
in the middle of the very wide distance between the woman and I, tried to inject a calming but defensive justifying statement, I
think. His remark was that he had
checked that statement and “Ryan hadn’t said that, he had simply used
innuendo.” I made some comment
questioning how honest that was, but was so disgusted, and the
atmosphere was obviously so highly emotionally charged, that I decided I’d be
wise to just leave there.
My mood was befouled by that time, but I drove down Foothill Blvd. a
couple of miles into the next city to a
corner intersection occupied by a stand alone national fast food restaurant and
a drive-in key making stand. I turned
south into a somewhat long-declining shopping strip with a huge vacant anchor space
once occupied by several different major grocery chains each of which was unable
to survive for long.
The rest of the strip included some vacant storefronts
interspersed between a small popular chain electronics store, a laundromat, a
drugstore, beauty supply store, auto parts store, and a few other businesses. Across the main wide divided street was
another long strip mall with all sorts of businesses, including a popular
family-owned restaurant whose genuine Mexican food many of us enjoy. A national company gas station/store is on
that corner.
At a right angle from that long vacant grocery store
building, clear at the end of the first strip described here, was the rather invisible
Democratic Headquarters. They had opened
the day before their national North
Carolina convention which would soon begin. They had plenty of parking spaces available,
as I mentioned later to those manning the party headquarters. They are probably well situated to attract nearby
residents, in apartment complexes, foot traffic, and bus traffic going in all
directions to and from Los Angeles,
plus points east.
The city of this headquarters location has quite a different
demographics and higher population numbers than my next door city. The recent primary election had shown a significant
increase in Republican voters in this neighboring city which some political
writers had said should be of concern to the Democratic Party.
I saw only two individual workers in the Democratic
Headquarters when I entered and walked straight ahead to tables with a variety
of printed handouts, similar in appearance, but fewer in number than I had
previously encountered at the other headquarters. There clearly
was no Democratic Platform brochure evident, but maybe they hadn’t yet adopted
one, so I didn’t even ask.
I did ask the woman who came forward what sort of volunteer
help they would be using.
My tone of voice and serious manner did not elicit a warm
smiling greeting which I soon realized.
I gave her the benefit of the doubt by assuming it was my problem and quickly apologized, noting I had just come from the Republican
Headquarters where I had become irritated and, regrettably, these feelings had
accompanied me here. She named several
groups who would be coming in the days ahead to man phone banks, calling people
to assist in their registration. I asked
if they were going to utilize volunteers to transport people to their voting
site. She replied, “No, not this year --
they had the previous election and no one ever called to ask for a ride.”
I expressed concern based on having read a news account
shortly after the Primary Election that Republicans had more voters cast
ballots than the Democrats, though there were more registered Democratic voters
in that county directly east of our own which had been described in the
article. The significant result was that two
Republicans had garnered most of the votes and would be the candidates in the
general election and there would be no Democratic candidate. She didn’t seem particularly concerned that getting
voters to the polls could be a problem here.
I mentioned we all help our candidates in differing ways and
that I knew many were writing some strong blog content in support of theirs –
particularly for President Obama. She
turned away with a slightly dismissive look and toss of her head that
distinctly left me with the impression that she had little regard for blogging
as a useful act.
By this time, I had moved to a table toward the front side
of the room which had a long row of stacks and stacks of different pullover tee
shirt/sweat shirts – mostly black fabric with Obama’s likeness on the front,
and gaudily decorated for my taste, with all sorts of bright colored sprinkles
and sparkles. Perhaps they knew this
was what would appeal to those who would be seeking election souvenirs, or to
wear, in the community they were attracting.
Unfortunately, they were so unattractive to me I didn’t want to purchase
one. I didn’t see any pin-on type
buttons, but hadn’t seen any at the Republican Headquarters either.
The gentleman by that table came forward and a conversation
ensued in which we noted sharing the same surname, that neither of us knew, or
were related to any of the other people with our same name who lived in any of
the surrounding communities. I
reiterated my concern I had expressed to the woman I had spoken with, that
while voter registration was vital and
an issue in many other States, I thought what happened in that next door County
would suggest that getting people out to vote might need to be a major focus here
in So Cal. I received an explanation and
reassurance that what happened was a consequence of always present internal
complications in how the political party functioned there in that particular
county, but was not a concern here.
Also, he noted that he had checked the figures and Obama was
certain to accrue all the votes he needed in California.
This was not difficult to believe, since California has predominately been a
Democratic voting State. However, I felt
compelled to caution that if they wanted to be certain their candidate won, I
hoped they wouldn’t be complacent – that there had been other elections, other
years, whose outcome was thought to be known and proved not to be so.
Before I left the Democratic Headquarters the man with whom
I was speaking told me of group events they would be holding there in the
future, including watching some of the convention proceedings which was clearly
an unspoken invitation for me to return if I wished to do so.
My adventure into these political party headquarters
occurred with my having no agenda other than curiosity as to how I would be
greeted, what I might observe, the literature they would be distributing,
whether there would be an effort to elicit my support via my vote and/or my
volunteering to help elect their candidate.
In both instances I think the approach was one of allowing me to initiate any interaction, that
they were there to answer questions as opposed to influencing how I might cast my
ballot.
My questioning or expressing distaste for what one Parties
candidate had said, may have predisposed those Party representatives, or at
least one of them, to respond in a none to dialogue inviting manner. But then, I’ve been in situations much more
confrontational than that and was able
to respectfully have a friendly extended conversation with the person.
Inquiring and questioning the other Parties approach to
soliciting votes was probably not as threatening as commenting on one of their
candidates statements would have been.
So, maybe it was easier for them to be more cordial and want to bring me
into the fold.
This activity doesn’t sway my vote one way or another, and
took very little time. I didn’t really
learn anything I didn’t already know from the literature that was being
distributed. I expect our California political
headquarters are pretty calm compared to many other States, especially in those
States whose votes are considered to be critical.
Our particular area doesn’t really have that many other
candidates and issues to motivate political parties to aggressively promote
their point of view to voters even though we had redistricting. There is such a heavy emphasis on the
Presidential tickets that I think it overwhelms everything else. I do think there are some State issues that
will heat up our population before election day. Our two women Democratic Party Senators are
expected to be returned to office without difficulty. There may be some districts with some candidates for other national
offices and some state ones that those voters will need to seriously consider.
I wonder what’s politically exciting, or not, where you live?
I still don't know which way I am going to go. My biggest complaint about Obama last time around was his lack of experience. Now he has more than the other guy, but I distrust O's attitude toward business people. As you may know I am reading Bob Woodward's new book which is mercifully objective. (I've reached chapter 10 so far.) Virginia where I live is huge toss-up state. I like Tim Kaine (D-VA), so I could end up voting a split ticket again. And so it goes.
ReplyDeleteThanks for you comments yesterday. You are a thoughtful person, and I appreciate your visits to my blog. Dianne
Hawaii is where Obama was born, so most residents will vote for him. However, we must not be complacent, as Hawaii also has a low voting record and it is conceivable that he might lose.
ReplyDeleteDear Joared, I try to stay current by reading a variety of books that give me facts on our economy and political system. Right now, I'm reading "That Used to Be Us" by Thomas Friedman et. al. I've learned a lot and am moving more and more toward a belief that we truly need a viable third-party candidate in our political system. We had three in the 20th century: Teddy Roosevelt in 1912 (I think), George Wallace in 1968 (once again I'm not sure), and Ross Perot. None of them won but all of them influenced what the man who won did during his administration. A third-party candidate--and I'm not talking about the Tea Party here--can really give voters a view of where we truly are with the main issues that swamp our country right now. The two parties mostly gloss over them, lie about them, or obscure them. Peace.
ReplyDeleteSounds as if you'd have more satisfaction if there's a local issue to support. Just a thought.
ReplyDeleteTo Dee - You forgot Anderson the third party candidate in the Carter-Reagan contest. Carter said Anderson was a "spoiler" after he (Carter) lost to Reagan.
ReplyDeleteI have real difficulty ascertaining the truth in politics in UK. USA is even more difficult. When the political news is broadcast as sound bites it's impossible to judge accurately. All I can say is that it looks as though Obama is a safer bet than his opponents who appear to be dinosaurs - but then, what do I know?
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by and leaving a comment on our political situation. Sounds like you have a pretty good fix on the candidates here.
DeleteThe Green Party has been around as a third party for a while. This year's presidential candidate is Jill Stein (http://www.jillstein.org/). The problem right now with a liberal third party is that it will draw votes from the Democrats (obviously, I'm a liberal). I guess the issue for me is about what kind of country I want my grandson to grow up in. Certainly not one that thinks middle class incomes range between $150,000 and $250,000 and that any family making less then that just isn't making the effort.
ReplyDeleteFor reasons that are hard to understand, the Democrats seem to think President Obama will win Michigan handily. That despite the fact the Republicans dominated the last general election and our Republican governor is popular. I believe it will be a very close race in Michigan. It will be decided by how successful the Democrats are in getting out the vote.
ReplyDelete