Listening to comments after the 2012 Presidential Debate at
C-Span, where I viewed the event in live streaming video, I was surprised some
phone callers and twitterers were saying they were still undecided about how to
cast their ballots. Perhaps some individuals may only recently
have begun to examine all the significant issues. Maybe only now they’re seriously
considering the desired direction for this nation in the next four years as election day draws near.
I think there are profound differences
between candidates and political parties. Anyone viewing all the 2012 debates, including those of the
Vice-Presidential candidates, carefully listening to the rhetoric, and fact
checking candidates statements in those debates, could acquire sufficient
information on which to make an intelligent decision about whether to vote for
Democrats President Obama/Biden or Republicans Romney/Ryan, I think. However, I’ve been a political junkie since I
could first vote many years ago, so have been tracking events all along, and
there are many other pertinent issues that were not mentioned that voters would
be wise to learn about.
In addition to opinions formed from the debates, I would highly recommend
consideration also be given to the basic philosophy and values of each candidate's
political party. Long-time straight
party ticket voters should keep in mind there have been very significant
changes in those two major political parties beliefs and practices from their
once traditional positions as I've observed and based on the analysis of some political
experts. Unfortunately, we’re subjected to the
detrimental consequences of these changes resulting in a Congress
unable to come together to solve our nation’s problems. Given these political party differences voters would be wise to carefully research
the voting record and political beliefs of current and future Congressional candidates before voting for them, too.
Both parties used to be composed of conservative, moderate
and liberal members so that coalitions across party lines were more easily
formed on issues as some political analysts have said. I would also compare the composition
of both parties in more recent years to have been altered in ways others have described.
The Democratic Party position on many issues has become more
conservative, moderate, and much less liberal than it was for many years.
The Republican Party has become primarily
extremist/ultra-conservative, marginalizing/rejecting their moderate and more
liberal thinking members.
A lobbyist who is not even a member of Congress
has commandeered the Republican House of Representatives members, holding them
hostage to criteria he has dictated. That’s
not my idea of how an effective government of the people is intended to
function.
That ultra/extremist Republican group drives their
candidates, Romney/Ryan, with the extreme budget proposals (that don’t
even balance), while also predicting job creation based on an approach tried before that is known to not work. Despite generalizing
rhetoric about moving our nation forward in today’s world they provide few
specifics that compute accurately in dollars and cents/sense.
I’m also very troubled by candidate Mitt Romneys waffling
around about issues as he continues to do since he first began campaigning for
his political party’s nomination. He
even denies making previous well-documented pronouncements when he has contradicted them in later statements.
Here’s an original jazz recording with a title and lyrics most
appropriate for candidate Romney’s "Undecided" wishy washy positions:
“Django Reinhardt et le Quintette du Hot Club de France,
avec Stéphane Grappelli Stéphane Grappelli (vln); Django Reinhardt (g solo);
Joseph Reinhardt, Eugène Vées, Pierre "Baro" Ferret (g); Emmanuel
Soudieux (b); Beryl Davis (vcl)
1939 August 25 – London”
1939 August 25 – London”
“Undecided” Partial lyrics:
First you say you do
And then you don't
And then you say you will
And then you won't
You're undecided now
So what are you gonna do?
Now you want to play
And then it's no
And when you say you'll stay
That's when you go
You're undecided now
So what are you gonna do?
I've been sitting on a fence
And it doesn't make much sense
'Cause you keep me in suspense
And you know it
And then you don't
And then you say you will
And then you won't
You're undecided now
So what are you gonna do?
Now you want to play
And then it's no
And when you say you'll stay
That's when you go
You're undecided now
So what are you gonna do?
I've been sitting on a fence
And it doesn't make much sense
'Cause you keep me in suspense
And you know it
Now we know from Mr. Romney’s former company, Bain, that he is
able to invest the money of wealthy people to make them even more money – and some
for himself, too, (so what if it means collapsing a few companies, sending jobs overseas and/or workers losing
jobs.) Could we expect his business skills to
translate well to national governmental office?
Well, how did he do on even a
smaller governmental level – say for just one state – when he was Massachusetts
Governor? Hm-m-m…..
Gov. Romney’s state then was among the lowest in the country
in job creation.
Under his stewardship they had the second largest labor
force decline in the nation.
They lost double the rate of manufacturing jobs that the
nation as a whole lost.
He vetoed legislation that would have prevented doing
business with companies who outsourced jobs to other countries.
His state had below average economic growth, often close to the
bottom nationally.
Romney doesn't have much to crow about and is hypocritical when it comes to what he says about health care given the program with which he was involved in Massachusetts. These are only a few of many more less than positive facts that
prevent my voting for the Republican Romney/Ryan ticket.
I believe the Democrat Obama/Biden ticket offers the most
hope for continuing this nation on a road to gradual recovery in a manner that will:
create jobs,
benefit new business,
launch a rebirth of middle class America,
institute a fair and balanced tax system
..... that doesn't place undue financial
hardship on the wealthiest class,
cause the least financial and health harm to those of less
means,
provide health care to all citizens,
preserve Social Security and Medicare with realistic adjustments,
reduce our national debt in a sane reasonable manner,
rebuild our educational, social and physical infrastructure,
maintain
our military defense capability and national security,
continue developing positive foreign relations around the world.
We'll need a Congress with forward thinking vision that's willing to work for the salaries and benefits our taxes pay them to accomplish these goals for all generations today and for the future.
Dear Joared, thanks for stating my own thoughts and decision so succinctly and well. I, too, am voting for the Obama/Biden ticket. And I so hope that in Congress many of the Tea Party representatives elected in 2010 will be "unelected"! and that more moderate Republicans--if there are any--will take their place in both the House and the Senate.
ReplyDeleteThe recalcitrance of the Republicans in Congress has kept President Obama from accomplishing all he's tried to do. When Mitch O'Connell (spelling) says that he and his cronies are going to spend the next two years making sure that President Obama has only one term, then we know that governing is not high on the list of the Republicans in Congress. Peace.
Joared, I agree with you and Dee. I've already voted. Now, I'm just crossing my fingers and toes.
ReplyDeleteCheck out Saturday's "Up with Chris Hayes" and woman political scientist Stanford who talks about her research on the undecideds and some surprising outcomes http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46979738/vp/49580727#49580727
ReplyDeleteInteresting Hayes program and the "undecided voters" research. Thanks for the link. Note: the woman political scientist is associated with University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA,) not Stanford. Candidate Romney's reason for apparent "undecidedness" on issues may closely parallel those of the few truly undecided voters who may not understand all the factors.
ReplyDeleteI've long been amused with the increasing number of pundit grouping constructs i.e. soccer moms, etc., and efforts to apply generalized views to all.
Hi Jored. I posted your comment sent via email and thank you for the comments.
ReplyDeleteAs you might suspect, David and I are voting for Romney. We like him very much and think his approach to the economy will be the best. As good Americans, we will accept whatever verdict is decided next week. Dianne
PS next time you try to leave a message, use the Anonymous and sign your name. This what I do on some difficult to access sites. Don't know why WP gives you so much trouble. D.
I have already cast my vote for Obama. Romney is too dangerous. He doesn't seem to know what he thinks or what he is doing. Some people like men like him, but that is not the issue. He is so obviously incompetent.
ReplyDeleteI am for Obama all the way. And I agree with Hattie that Romney is dangerous and incompetent. Anyone who votes Republican imho is shooting themselves in the foot.
ReplyDelete