Sunday, May 15, 2022

CAN WOMEN CONTROL THEIR OWN BODY'S HEALTH?

The U. S. Supreme Court Dobbs vs Jackson pending legal case is one demanding significant attention.  This case decision will have profound consequences in our nation for women and men due to  ramifications for Roe vs Wade that legalized abortion in 1973.   

Reading CNN's  account of Politico that first published leaked Justice Alito's proposed 1st draft majority opinion (98 pgs)* suggests to me an ideologically obsessed Court.  The majority judges appear to have  gone to great lengths citing as a basis for their convolutional interpretation of our constitution justification to overturn a fifty-year precedent rule recognizing a woman has a right to decision-making about the health of her own body.   The Court's final decision is expected to be announced in late June or early July.

*(Note: click on emphasized content items to link with source.)

What I'm writing here is not about discussing the religious and moral question of abortion though those are signifiant issues individual women consider for themselves based on what they believe, also  in consultation with their health care provider(s)/physician.     Current reality and history through the ages is that some women will look for ways to end pregnancies as has always happened whatever one's belief and whatever the law.

NPR's fact checks include:  the majority of U.S. adults say abortion should be legal in most or all cases; the rate of abortions has decreased since 1973; more than 60% who get abortions have a religious affiliation.  

The issue of abortion with questionable issues about life has been so politicized which is reprehensible since the matter is one that should be between a woman and her doctor much less have a court of law injected into the matter. But that's what has happened.

What is really at stake with this currently pending case decision is:                                                          does the U. S Constitution guarantee equality for women?

Abortion is the current issue chosen to answer this question. There may be even more issues introduced later with rights of privacy and other fundamental rights also threatened if Roe vs Wade is overturned.  

One such right to consider, a friend wrote me recently:  "...the right granted in HIPAA should apply to women's reproductive rights.  It's nobody's business but patient/doctor."

"HIPAA:  The health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) is a federal law that required the creation of national standards to protect sensitive patient health information from being disclosed without the patient's consent or knowledge."  

"Abortions: Past, Present and Future" with an unsettling photo referencing Handmaid Tale-like laws is written by Jean you can view by clicking on her blog: "Misadventures of Widowhood".   She has advocated "keeping abortions safe, legal and rare."

"Handmaid's Tale" references Margaret Atwood's book to which she referred in a current Atlantic article.  She wrote: "I invented Gilead.  The Supreme Court is making it real.  I thought I was writing fiction".   She went on to write, should this Supreme Court adopt Judge Alito's majority opinion to overturn Roe vs Wade the United States would be "...turned into a theocratic dictatorship based on 17th-century NewEngland Puritan religious tenets and jurisprudence."  She asks, "Is this where we want to live?"

Margaret Atwood's 'Handmaid's Tale' Is Inspiring A New Generation

Some of you may recall Ronni Bennettt's blog, "Time Goes By" (TGB), you can still access by clicking on that link.  Some of what she wrote over the years is current even now as you will see.

(Ronni's writings with comments are still available on her internet site which she made significant effort to ensure would be available for a period after her expected death just as many fellow bloggers said they wanted.  Since her blog's continuation by a friend as Ronni wrote she had arranged has not occurred and no explanation after 2018 has been provided as to when or whether if ever will, I'm taking the liberty of linking for you to some of Ronni's blog posts to share here.)

Ronni hoped blog conversations would continue many timely topics she introduced that are not outdated today.  She documented what she wrote, identified thoughts as her opinions when she expressed them and sometimes offered suggestions about how to resolve some issues.  She often cited examples of the subjects about which she wrote to bring to others attention.   Ronni hoped other bloggers would also note examples they encountered in their lives writing about them, too, perhaps attracting additional bloggers to do the same since many doing so might influence desired change.  One such topic was Roe vs Wade and issues concerning a woman's health.

"The Supreme Court Abortion Decision" Ronni published first at Blogher, then on TGB in April 2007 questioned the Court's ruling on a case "...banning late-term abortion with no provision for the health of the mother".  In lieu of the strong words I think Ronni would be writing today I recommend you read what she wrote then that is still pertinent.  

Ronni felt so strongly about the matter that in her forthright honest manner she revealed in that article her own personal harrowing experience as an example of what women were and can be subjected to if Roe vs Wade is overturned by the Court.

Ronni also wrote:  Until a man is capable of giving birth and/or every man is forced by law to both financially support and participate in the gestation and raising of every child he fathers, and such law is enforced without exception (a permanent ankle tracking device for those who run comes to mind) no man has a right to discuss abortion, let alone to vote on it. 

In September 2018 Ronni shared in another post "The Penis Legislation Act" during now Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh's Senate hearings for that appointment. He was questioned about his views on a woman's right to choose.

Read Associated Press News for what Kavanaugh and other judges said in their nomination hearings about Roe to the Senate panel.  

Devorah Blachor's  satirical article, "Why Are Men Getting So Hysterical About the Penis Legislation Act?" prompted Ronni's post which is a must read.  Just imagine if men's bodies and sexual organ/function was subjected to legislation, much less judicial judgement as this "Act" describes.

The point of all this I want to make is the simplicity of the issue -- it's not complicated.   

Our Supreme Court's decision should affirm in the case before them now upholding the 50-year precedent Roe vs Wade rule ensuring women's right to make health decisions for their own bodies as the Piedtype blogger notes in "It's About Equality" with excerpts below:

"From  'America Is Not Ready for the End of Roe v. Wade' by the New York Times editorial board on May 6:

The principle is clear:

   Women and men should have equal control over their own bodies ...

Even more fundamental than our religious and/or unscientific differences about when human life begins is that simple statement:  Women and men should have equal control over their own bodies.  To deny women the right to abortion is to deny them equality with men.  Period.

Gender equality in the United States either is, or it isn't."  

Thousands gather for pro-abortion rights rally in Los Angeles and across the nation/ABC-TV 7

30 comments:

  1. I hope that you understand if I don't comment. I am not qualified to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do appreciate that readers here who live in other countries often do not wish to inject any views they may have on some of our governing issues and i certainly respect that position.

      A name added to the comment always helps assure an Anonymous commenter is not a troll but your content was most acceptable.

      Delete
  2. I agree with 95% of what you write except I think it can get very complicated and is not always all that simple. Just like IVF and stored fertilized eggs got very complicated. I also feel that we need to have a men's DNA bank to make sure that all children have financial support from their fathers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think in some instances a woman might choose to discuss with the man who impregnated her the issue of abortion, but the final.choice is the woman’s — it’s her body and her health.

      Delete
  3. Thanks for the Ronni sites. I sure miss her. Loved the statement about until man is regulated to financially support and participate in the lives of every child they father, men have no right to try to legislate abortion. Ronni would be appalled at what is going on today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I especially enjoyed the satirical piece she found to share about how men would react if legislation, or in the situation now, the judiciary was dictating about their body, impacting their health for possibly life or death consequences.

      Delete
  4. You and Ronni both say/said it so well. I've been pro-choice all my life and the impending destruction of Roe v. Wade is absolutely devastating. That total strangers would presume to tell a woman what she and her doctor can do is infuriating. It's about privacy. It's about equality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ronni certainly pinpointed matters in very readable language I’ve appreciated, too.

      Delete
  5. I can't thank you enough for this post, Joared. You've gathered everything I've wished to have documented in one place. I will be sharing this at my blog and everywhere I can share it, especially this from Ronni:

    "Until a man is capable of giving birth and/or every man is forced by law to both financially support and participate in the gestation and raising of every child he fathers, and such law is enforced without exception (a permanent ankle tracking device for those who run comes to mind) no man has a right to discuss abortion, let alone to vote on it."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sharing the facts of this issue can be valuable letting others become aware of the concerns.

      Delete
  6. So good to hear Ronni's voice again and a reminder of her thoughts. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you for writing this and for including a link to my blog. The more voices we get to speak out here in cyberspace and in your daily lives the better. Time is running out!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You’re welcome, though I’m not sure to whom I’m replying.

      Delete
  8. Wonderfully written. Thank you.
    I miss Ronnie too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We all do miss her. Thanks for stopping by.

      Delete
  9. This is Jean but for some reason when I left my 'thank you' comment above it left it anonymous

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who knows what Blogger does sometimes. The Shadow knows!

      Delete
  10. Thank you for such a (time consuming to write) thought provoking fabulous blog Joared. I always appreciate your blog entries. Ronnie was wonderful, also. Take special care.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much, Mary. Yes, it was time consuming but, selfishly, I wanted to pull together a lot of these references I thought might be of interest in time to come and they'd all be in one spot. Also, I thought Ronni was unique in her own way and I greatly appreciated her influence that started me writing. I told her when she first suggested I do so, "You must be crazy!" I knew little of her professional experience at that time. So, I've been having fun ever since.

      Delete
  11. It's absolutely not complicated. Time after time, in hundreds of cases when men have had multiple children that they have not supported, judges have said they wished they had the power to rule that the men were no longer able to procreate until they paid adequate support for the children they already had. But the law does not allow this, the judges say. It goes against your civil rights.

    There is NO LAW THAT REGULATES MEN'S BODIES.

    If you don't want abortion, control it at the source.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The possibility that the Roe v Wade decision might be overturned is appalling. Yet again men want to tell women what to do with their own bodies. I hope there is sufficient opposition to prevent a disastrous change in the law.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I am Pro-Life and against abortion except for a few exceptions. Good for the Supreme Court!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think there is any political/legal/scientific/everyday Americans agreement regarding when or at what developmental stage fertilized human cells become viably acceptable to be considered appropriate for being aborted. Currently, there seem to be many instances in states where there will be ineffective or no exceptions allowing abortions resulting in an unborn fetuses life at any stage of development taking precedence over that of the mother if Roe is overturned. Whose life should prevail?

      There's still the issue of women being relegated to less than equal if we aren't permitted to control the health of our own body, including anything developing or growing inside of us, unlike the control men have of their bodies. Does our constitution guarantee equality to all Americans, or are some more equal than the rest? Who else might be determined to be less equal and for what reason?

      Delete
  14. As always it seems like things of this import don't get the attention it needs before it is already too late. I think that is happening here and the only answer I can imagine is to increase the members of the Supreme Court. A very controversial action but look at the alterative. McConnel has sure lived up to his nickname of "the grand reaper" ...not only did he finagle it so Obama's pick was never even considered, but the 3 picks of the Federalist Society were rammed in up to the very last moment of Trump's Presedency. Our country is very close to being no longer "our country"....so sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you’re quite correct that matters of import “don't get the attention needed until it’s too late”. The few voices that do speak out fall on deaf ears. I don't know what it takes to get more people to speak out and others to listen, then act.

      Delete
  15. This is a reasoned response to a difficult issue but a n important issue. Thank you for writing and posting. I can have respect for those who believe abortion is abhorrent, but I can absolutely not respect attempts to force beliefs/opinions on others. I have my own strong beliefs that are based on my own spiritual education and personal experiences. I support a woman's right to choose what happens with her own body and pray that most often those decisions come from wisdom and deep' compassion,
    If you have not walked in my shoes, you cannot know what is in my heart and mind and body memory. You have no rights to decisions or judgements.

    ReplyDelete